Philanthropy Death Match: Apple vs. Microsoft

On September 27, 2011, in Computer, by laura
2

With a lot of wealth and influence comes a lot of responsibility. America’s most wealthy have the ability to stimulate change with the swipe of a pen. Unfortunately, not all of them do. Microsoft and Apple Inc. are two of the largest and most well known, well producing American businesses. Initially, Bill Gates received a ton of scrutiny for the lack of funds he was giving away. However, once he and his wife decided to use the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000 to give away their fortune naysayers began singing his praises. Bill Gates’ generosity has created a fantastic face for philanthropy and generally put Microsoft “in the clear” of being labeled “greedy.” Unfortunately, when it comes to philanthropy comparing Microsoft and Apple isn’t really a contest. Steve Jobs, former Apple CEO, has a sparse record when it comes to philanthropy that has afforded him a little more scrutiny.

To be fair, it is not that Jobs has never been involved in philanthropy. Bono, singer in the pop band U2, is the founder of the (Product)RED campaign. After Jobs was critiqued in a New York Times article Bono stated that Apple’s support of his campaign was “invaluable.” He further claimed that “through the sale of (RED) products, Apple has been (RED)’s largest contributor to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.” Apple helped AID’s victims in Africa in a really tangible and significant way–providing millions of dollars towards material support. They advanced the idea that health insurance is a human right. They may not have been providing personal health insurance like we have in the U.S. but they were providing medicine to the masses etc.

Other than supporting (RED) products, Apple showed its support of civil rights in 2008 when it gave $100,000 to a group looking to block Proposition 8, a ballot that would have banned same-sex marriage in California. These contributions are fantastic, but considering the amount Apple could give they seem to come up short.

Jobs had always been a private person. By the time he stepped down on August 24th most of his pubic appearances occurred when he was showing off a new Apple product. So it is possible that Jobs’ philanthropy has been vast but anonymous. However, the amount of money that Jobs has accrued (around $8.3 billion from Apple alone) would be hard to move without making any noise.

It seems odd that the billionaire has had little influence in the philanthropic community. For one, by the time Jobs stepped down he was working at Apple for the salary of $1 a year. Additionally jobs has been quoted saying “My main reaction to this money thing is that it’s humorous, all the attention to it, because it’s hardly the most insightful or valuable thing that’s happened to me.” Clearly Jobs’ money is not the reason he’s kept working. So why keep it?

It’s possible that Jobs will make a turn toward philanthropy now that his responsibilities at Apple have been largely decreased. In the absence of Jobs, Apple’s philanthropy has already taken a turn for the better. Tim Cook, the capable new CEO of Apple, has reestablished Apple’s charitable matching program; one of the first things to go when Jobs returned to the company.

The announcement of Cook’s positive change was made Thursday in a company email. Hopefully this change will be the first of many that can steer the behemoth of Apple back on the right track. Apple is such a force of innovation in our world that having their powers used for the good of humanity could be invaluable.

 

Today’s Eco-Friendly Education Options

On September 24, 2011, in Eco Friendly, by laura
0

Lately, green is a very popular color. Al Gore takes lots of ribbing and abuse for his global warming warnings. However, many people have begun to take notice of all the damage we are doing to our planet. Since this is the only place we know of in our solar system that will sustain us, it is way past time that everyone alive today joins the cause and does their small part in conserving our limited natural resources.  Education is one area that certainly needs some focus.

Course Offerings in Enviro Sciences

Aside from helping our environment, a green push can help to create some badly needed jobs in the sustainable energy, green building, and other related industries. Rather than remaining dependent on oil, a resource that we know is finite, why not spend time develop new ways to capture renewable sources of energy like the sun, wind, and hydropower? Though we have had some forms of these for years, advancements are slow to come, likely because they are not profitable for the big oil companies (which spend billions each year for lobbyists in Washington.)

Colleges are expanding their environmental offerings at a rapid rate, which is encouraging. They will be capable of turning out students with the knowledge required to make the technological changes that we need desperately.  Schools are also ramping up programs of sustainability on campus—recycling, adding solar panels, consulting with LEED professionals, installing more efficient HVAC systems and automated control systems to reduce energy consumption. Another initiative at post-secondary schools is building partnerships within the sustainable energy industry.

Some universities now offer degrees in environmental science, and offer them a choice of environmental science or environmental policy, depending upon the career path they choose. Other universities offer environmental engineering programs that help to equip students to design efficient systems to save fuel and other natural resources.

Virtual Learning

With the advent of personal computers and video conferencing technology, it is possible to take an interactive course of studies almost completely off-campus. By all accounts, eLearning departments all over the country are booming. The convenience for students who are often working their way through school cannot be understated.  Moreover, an effect of less travel is less pollution and conservation of fuel.

In the State of Florida, about 3% of students in the public school system rely on Florida virtual schools to complete their education. Not all of them are full-time enrollees. Some are taking one makeup course or attending during an illness so that they stay up to date. Others add an extra course or an advanced class to an otherwise crowded school day by learning virtually. Some, however, are happily learning from home.

Over time, Florida and other states that have adopted similar virtual public schools, intend to save a lot of money and resources on construction, overhead, and transportation costs, while also limiting the size of each class for individual attention.  The curriculum is the same for in-school students as it is for virtual students, and it is free. Students in the same household typically share the same virtual teacher and the system sends everything necessary for the lessons: books to goggles, scales, paint, seeds, and workbooks included.

While virtual schooling in the early years is gaining popularity because of the high costs as mentioned earlier with public schools, and because of safety issues, an unintentional side effect is a reduction in energy consumption and consumption of other natural resources like building materials.

Denise Gabbard has been writing and blogging for over five years, and she writes about a wide range of topics. Education, travel, pets, personal finance, and even horse lorry insurance are common topics.

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 519 access attempts in the last 7 days.